The Election Section V2.6

Sorry, but I can’t let last night’s “Leader’s Debate” pass without comment.

Not that I watched it. Well, not much of it, anyway.

I saw the end, and was tickled to see, as the lights went down and the credits rolled, all of the leaders (and stand-ins) step from behind their podiums and shake hands with each other – all except UKIP’s Paul Nuttall, who remained where he had stood throughout the proceedings, with not one fellow debater moving in his direction with hand out-stretched.

I switched channels a couple of times during the debate, to find what appeared to be a competition to see who could shout loudest while the others were talking. My ears have not been offended so much since I had to listen to several Ed Sheeran records consecutively recently.

And I caught the opening addresses, where Lib Dem leader Tim Farron delivered what I believe is known as “absolute zinger”:

“Amber Rudd is up next. She is not the prime minister. The prime minister is not here tonight. She can’t be bothered. So why should you?

In fact, Bake Off is on BBC2 next. Why not make yourself a brew? You are not worth Theresa May’s time. Don’t give her yours.”

Sadly, I managed to miss Rudd’s quite extraordinary analogy between Corbyn’s policies and a game of Monopoly:

“His proposals don’t add up. It’s as though he thinks it’s some sort of game, a game of Monopoly perhaps, where you ask the banker for the red money to buy the electrics, the green money to buy the railways, and the yellow money to buy the gas works.”

Ah, yes: Monopoly, that game well know for the different colours of money which can only be spent on the infrastructure and the utility services. You’d think a right-wing capitalist such as Rudd would at least know the basics of  a game like Monopoly, wouldn’t you?

But anyway, back to Tim Farron, or rather, to the absence of our current Prime Minister.

You’ll recall that Theresa May has said all along that she wouldn’t take part in these debates, and I have previously commented on the fact that Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, when presented with this open goal, had also confirmed that if May wasn’t going to take part, then neither was he.

On the bus on the way into work yesterday, an alert flashed up on my phone: Corbyn had changed his mind, was going to take part, and challenged May to do likewise.

Now, I’d like to think this was some kind of master-plan by Corbyn, that he’d intended to take part all the time, but was playing the long-game with his earlier denial. But I think I’d be crediting him and his campaign runners with a tad more tactical nous then they deserve.

But what his about-turn (not a U-turn, mind) did was place May in a lose-lose situation: turn up and it would look like she was handing the initiative to Corbyn; stay away and she risked looking like she was afraid to debate her policies.

And, of course stay away she did, sending Home Secretary Amber Rudd in her place, despite the fact that Rudd’s father had passed away just two days earlier.

May couldn’t really do anything but stay away; to change tack again – having done so not only with regards to her decision to hold the election, but also, to give just two examples of many, with regards to the cap on the so-called Dementia Tax (which she categorically didn’t do a U-turn on. “Nothing has changed, nothing has changed,” she squawked when challenged on this, despite it being patently obvious to everyone that announcing a cap after categorically stating there would be none once you realise how deeply unpopular a policy is, is, if noting else, most definitely a change) – would do nothing to add to her “strong and stable” mantra.

MAXIMO_PARK_GOING+MISSING-329552

So, when asked why she wouldn’t be taking part in the debate on Wednesday night, May’s response was this:
“I’m interested in the fact that Jeremy Corbyn seems to be paying far more attention to how many appearances on telly he’s doing. I think he ought to be paying a little more attention to thinking about Brexit negotiations. That’s what I’m doing, to make sure we get the best possible deal for Britain.”
There’s quite a lot to unpack there.
  • Firstly, I wonder if anyone has asked what conclusions she came to when thinking about the Brexit negotiations last night?
  • Secondly, is this not  a tacit acknowledgement by May that Corbyn might just need to be thinking about the Brexit negotiations? Surely she’d have been better of saying: “I couldn’t give a monkey’s what Corbyn does with his evenings, he won’t be in charge after June 8th. I will, so I’m going to be concentrating on the Brexit negotiations rather than appearing on the debate (and telling Philip to put the bins out)”?
  • And finally, it seems to have escaped her attention, but she called the election in the first place. If she was so concerned about and focussed on the Brexit negotiations, what the hell was she doing calling a decidedly distracting snap election straight after triggering Article 50?
And then, as I was heading home from work today, another alert. May has now announced she won’t be taking part in tomorrow’s “Women’s Hour” programme on Radio 4, preferring to send Justine Greening instead.
Cue an Ed Miliband Twitter-burn:
Screenshot_20170601-205016
There’s only one conclusion to come to, isn’t there….?:
R-36331-1370434432-2946_jpeg
More soon.
Advertisements

Published by

Jez

On Twitter: @atastehistory or me (where you're more likely to get a reply and a follow back): @jezbionic or by email at: dubioustaste26@gmail.com

8 thoughts on “The Election Section V2.6”

  1. You’re very good at this kind of blogging aren’t you – It’s all starting to get a little more interesting (if that’s the word). Yes the reference to Bake Off was spot on – the non-appearances of TM are certainly causing a bit of a stir. Still a week to go so all to play for.

    1. Thanks, very kind of you to say so.

      All to play for, as you say, and the polls say the gap is closing..not that I put much faith in them, obviously.

      Be nice to be on the winning side for once, mind!

      1. The polls have been consistently wrong for the last three votes as they just can’t seem to factor in the shy Tory, the shy Brexiteer or the shy Trumper. Not sure this time who is shy about what though and I’m afraid we Scots have split the left of centre vote.

  2. That hopefully shouldn’t matter too much Alyson if it stops the Tories getting a majority and there is a progressive alliance or a coalition of chaos depending on your point of view

    1. True but they always categorically say there will be no coalitions. Watching the debate the other night five of the leaders were pretty much on the same page. I’ll not mention the other two.

  3. Is it becoming ever clearer that Mrs May is actually a bit stupid? Not on the Michael Fallon/Liam Fox scale of epic stupidity (and more than a touch of nastiness), but, simply, a bit dim.

    1. Agreed. Why try to base their election campaign on her personality and ability to perform/debate/negotiate, when it’s obvious she can’t do any of those things and has an objectionable personality?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s